Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics: The Journal of Scientific Studies and Multidisciplinary Research

The Journal of Scientific Studies and Multidisciplinary Research is committed to maintaining the highest standards of ethical behavior in all stages of the publication process. The journal's publication ethics guidelines are designed to ensure the integrity of the research published and to foster trust among authors, reviewers, and readers. Below are the key ethical principles that the journal upholds:

  1. Authorship and Contribution

Authorship Criteria: Only individuals who have made significant contributions to the research and manuscript should be listed as authors. Contributions may include study design, data collection, analysis, and manuscript drafting or revision.

Acknowledgment of Contributions: Individuals who contributed to the work but do not meet the authorship criteria should be acknowledged in the manuscript.

Order of Authors: The order of authors should be agreed upon by all co-authors, and any changes to the author list after submission should be approved by all authors.

  1. Originality and Plagiarism

Original Work: Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original and has not been published elsewhere. If the work includes material from other sources, proper citation and acknowledgment must be given.

Plagiarism: The journal strictly prohibits plagiarism in any form, including the copying of text, ideas, data, or figures without appropriate citation. Manuscripts suspected of plagiarism will be rejected, and authors may be barred from submitting future work to the journal.

  1. Data Integrity and Fabrication

Data Accuracy: Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of their data. Any errors in the data should be corrected before submission.

Data Fabrication and Falsification: The journal does not tolerate the fabrication or falsification of data. Any manipulation of data that misleads the reader is considered unethical and will result in the rejection of the manuscript.

  1. Conflicts of Interest

Disclosure: Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the interpretation of their research. This includes financial, personal, or professional relationships with other organizations or individuals that could be perceived as biasing the work.

Transparency: Reviewers and editors must also disclose any conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where such conflicts exist.

  1. Ethical Approval of Research

Human and Animal Subjects: Research involving human or animal subjects must adhere to ethical guidelines and have received approval from relevant ethics committees. A statement of ethical approval must be included in the manuscript.

Informed Consent: For research involving human participants, authors must ensure that informed consent was obtained from all participants and that their privacy rights are respected.

  1. Peer Review Process

Double-Blind Review: The journal follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartiality. Reviewers are expected to provide objective and constructive feedback, free from personal bias.

Confidentiality: Reviewers must treat manuscripts as confidential documents and must not disclose or discuss the manuscript with others except as authorized by the journal.

Timeliness: Reviewers should complete their reviews within the agreed-upon timeframe to ensure a prompt publication process.

  1. Corrections and Retractions

Corrections: If errors are discovered in published work, the authors are obliged to promptly notify the journal and cooperate in issuing corrections or clarifications.

Retractions: In cases of serious ethical breaches, such as plagiarism or data fabrication, the journal may retract the published article. Retractions will be clearly labeled and linked to the original publication.

  1. Responsibilities of Editors

Decision-Making: Editors have the responsibility to make fair and unbiased publication decisions based on the manuscript's quality, relevance, and originality.

Ethical Oversight: Editors must ensure that all published research complies with ethical standards. They should investigate and address any ethical concerns raised by readers, reviewers, or other editors.

  1. Reporting Ethical Concerns

Complaints and Appeals: The journal provides a mechanism for authors, reviewers, and readers to raise ethical concerns about published work or the conduct of the publication process. All complaints will be taken seriously and investigated thoroughly.

By adhering to these ethical guidelines, the Journal of Scientific Studies and Multidisciplinary Research seeks to uphold the integrity of academic publishing and contribute to the advancement of trustworthy and high-quality research.

Focus & Scope: The Journal of Scientific Studies and Multidisciplinary Research

The Journal of Scientific Studies and Multidisciplinary Research is dedicated to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed research that explores the intersection of multiple academic disciplines. The journal's primary aim is to foster interdisciplinary collaboration and provide a platform for research that addresses complex, real-world problems through the integration of diverse fields of study.